On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 15:13 +0800, kai wrote:
> On 9/29/22 14:49, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 11:32 +0800, kai wrote:
> > > From: Kai Kang <kai.k...@windriver.com>
> > > 
> > > It disables gprofng for toolchain clang, so it should clear GPROFNG_ALTS
> > > when clang is used. But override 'toolchain-clang' is applied before
> > > overrides 'TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH' such as x86-64, then GPROFNG_ALTS is
> > > still set and not cleared. Append 'forcevariable' to apply it last then
> > > make it work as expected.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.k...@windriver.com>
> > > ---
> > >   meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc 
> > > b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> > > index 4dde387a8a..c7113f8a1f 100644
> > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> > > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ GPROFNG_ALTS:x86-64 = "${GPROFNGS}"
> > >   GPROFNG_ALTS:aarch64 = "${GPROFNGS}"
> > >   
> > >   # it disables gprofng for clang and musl in the bb file
> > > -GPROFNG_ALTS:toolchain-clang = ""
> > > +GPROFNG_ALTS:toolchain-clang:forcevariable = ""
> > >   GPROFNG_ALTS:libc-musl = ""
> > >   
> > >   LDGOLD_ALTS ?= "ld.gold dwp"
> > I've never wanted to see forcevariable used in layers, it is really
> > there as a last resort for end users. There must be some other way we
> > can arrange this?
> 
> It could clear GPROFNG_ALTS for toolchain-clang in python anonymous 
> function. I'll send for review.

GPROFNG:toolchain-clang = ""

might work?

Cheers,

Richard

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#171171): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/171171
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/93987802/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to