The 2nd more important part was backported to 2.36 branch https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=302bc33bc53c787da6e74162a7092e9c0fb964a8
If you plan to do another SRCREV bump before glibc upgrade is merged, then we can drop these 2 changes. (I'll try to do another build tests with DEBUG_BUILD, but probably next week or so). On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:50 PM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > These patches were appplied in master > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > --- > .../0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch | 2 +- > .../0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git > a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch > index 2d14a4c6196..2caff3a0d53 100644 > --- > a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch > +++ > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-x86-Fix-define-STRCPY-guard-in-strcpy-sse2.S.patch > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Subject: [PATCH] x86: Fix `#define STRCPY` guard in > strcpy-sse2.S > defined. It doesn't end up mattering as the whole check is > guarded by `#if IS_IN (libc)` but is incorrect none the less. > > -Upstream-Status: Submitted [ > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29454 > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141289.html] > +Upstream-Status: Backport [ > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=312ded0d6339e8c463d0395397b5825401b14f54 > ] > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > --- > sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strcpy-sse2.S | 2 +- > diff --git > a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch > index 1b347b33226..a2c951ad936 100644 > --- > a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch > +++ > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0027-elf-Replace-strcpy-call-with-memcpy-BZ-29454.patch > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ strlen_pass::handle_builtin_strcpy but only for optimized > build. To avoid needing to include strcpy.S in the rtld build to > support the debug build, just do the optimization by hand. > > -Upstream-Status: Submitted [ > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29454 > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-August/141290.html] > +Upstream-Status: Backport [ > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=483cfe1a6a33d6335b1901581b41040d2d412511 > ] > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > --- > elf/dl-cache.c | 5 +++-- > -- > 2.37.1 > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#169254): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169254 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92916378/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
