Thanks Khem, v3 builds fine with gprofng enabled again.
Tested-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> any idea why binutils-2.39 v3 version isn't visible on patchwork yet? https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe-core/list/?series=&submitter=&state=*&q=binutils&archive=&delegate= it's almost 1,5 hour since you sent it to ML https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169001 Usually patchwork doesn't have such long delay (v2 was there shortly after I've noticed it in my mbox). On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 7:37 PM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 9:41 AM Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 6:06 PM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Details of changes [1] > >> > >> [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-August/122246.html > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> v2: Remove trailing .0 from PV > >> > >> meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc | 2 +- > >> .../{binutils-2.38.inc => binutils-2.39.inc} | 26 +- > >> ....38.bb => binutils-cross-canadian_2.39.bb} | 0 > >> ...38.bb => binutils-cross-testsuite_2.39.bb} | 0 > >> ...s-cross_2.38.bb => binutils-cross_2.39.bb} | 0 > >> ...ssdk_2.38.bb => binutils-crosssdk_2.39.bb} | 0 > >> ...s-crosssdk-Generate-relocatable-SDKs.patch | 2 +- > >> ...o-not-generate-linker-script-directo.patch | 2 +- > >> ...dk-Search-for-alternative-ld.so.conf.patch | 16 +- > >> ...004-Point-scripts-location-to-libdir.patch | 10 +- > >> ...tro-compiler-point-to-the-wrong-ins.patch} | 2 +- > >> ...system-directories-when-cross-linki.patch} | 42 +- > >> ...ct-assembling-for-ppc-wait-mnemonic.patch} | 8 +- > >> ...l-2.4.patch => 0008-Use-libtool-2.4.patch} | 2131 ++++++++--------- > >> ...-in-libtool-when-sysroot-is-enabled.patch} | 2 +- > >> ...> 0010-sync-with-OE-libtool-changes.patch} | 2 +- > >> ...r-clang-before-checking-gcc-version.patch} | 10 +- > >> ...RPATH-entry-if-LD_RUN_PATH-is-not-e.patch} | 17 +- > >> .../0013-Avoid-as-info-race-condition.patch | 75 - > >> .../binutils/0014-CVE-2019-1010204.patch | 49 - > >> .../{binutils_2.38.bb => binutils_2.39.bb} | 0 > >> 21 files changed, 1129 insertions(+), 1267 deletions(-) > >> rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-2.38.inc => > binutils-2.39.inc} (60%) > >> rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-cross-canadian_2.38.bb > => binutils-cross-canadian_2.39.bb} (100%) > >> rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{ > binutils-cross-testsuite_2.38.bb => binutils-cross-testsuite_2.39.bb} > (100%) > >> rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-cross_2.38.bb => > binutils-cross_2.39.bb} (100%) > >> rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils-crosssdk_2.38.bb => > binutils-crosssdk_2.39.bb} (100%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0006-don-t-let-the-distro-compiler-point-to-the-wrong-ins.patch > => 0005-don-t-let-the-distro-compiler-point-to-the-wrong-ins.patch} (94%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0007-warn-for-uses-of-system-directories-when-cross-linki.patch > => 0006-warn-for-uses-of-system-directories-when-cross-linki.patch} (91%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0008-fix-the-incorrect-assembling-for-ppc-wait-mnemonic.patch > => 0007-fix-the-incorrect-assembling-for-ppc-wait-mnemonic.patch} (85%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0009-Use-libtool-2.4.patch => > 0008-Use-libtool-2.4.patch} (95%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0010-Fix-rpath-in-libtool-when-sysroot-is-enabled.patch > => 0009-Fix-rpath-in-libtool-when-sysroot-is-enabled.patch} (96%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0011-sync-with-OE-libtool-changes.patch > => 0010-sync-with-OE-libtool-changes.patch} (97%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0012-Check-for-clang-before-checking-gcc-version.patch > => 0011-Check-for-clang-before-checking-gcc-version.patch} (84%) > >> rename > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/{0005-Only-generate-an-RPATH-entry-if-LD_RUN_PATH-is-not-e.patch > => 0012-Only-generate-an-RPATH-entry-if-LD_RUN_PATH-is-not-e.patch} (70%) > >> delete mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0013-Avoid-as-info-race-condition.patch > >> delete mode 100644 > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0014-CVE-2019-1010204.patch > >> rename meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/{binutils_2.38.bb => > binutils_2.39.bb} (100%) > > > > > > I'm seeing bunch of libtool erros with this applied, see: > > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/664878/ > > yes. gprofng is a new tool and I have forgotten to upgrade it to use > libtool 2.4 since I have it disabed in my testing. I have done so now > and sent a v3. Try it out. >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#169004): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169004 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92874030/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
