On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: >> >> Op 5 feb. 2012, om 23:16 heeft Andreas Müller het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> is it a bug or a feature that do_rootfs does not create the package >>> information (packed_files / packages ..) in a deploy sub-folder did I >>> miss a switch for this? >> >> It's this one: >> http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/meta-angstrom/commit/?id=370a884b2372b7ddd5f0876119b5f28a2b20074f >> >> The matching commit it missing, but you can add something like this to your >> local.conf: >> >> INHERIT += "buildhistory" >> BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT = "1" >> BUILDHISTORY_DIR = "/data/ssd/OE/buildhistory/" >> >> That will create a tree that looks like >> https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/buildhistory/. It it's missing a >> feature that you were using in testlab, let us know and Paul or I will try >> to add it to buildhistory. >> >> regards, >> >> Koen > Thanks for the info - will give buildhistory a test. > > Without having experience on buildhistory I have a question: As you > might know there was a discussion about the order of packages in > bitbake.conf [1]. I have no idea of the workflow for this issue: > > 1. Enable buildhistory as said above > 2. Build from scratch > 3. change the PACKAGES order in bitbake.conf > 4. ?? > > If I just rebuild without any PR-bumps I assume buildhistory can do > nothing for me. Correct? > > Andreas > [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-January/016916.html
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
