Hello Richard,

On Thu,  9 Jun 2022 12:37:28 +0100
"Richard Purdie" <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> There is a load of duplicated git/layer/revision code which makes
> most sesne as a python library, not bbclass code. Start to refactor as such.

s/sesne/sense/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  meta/classes/base.bbclass            |  9 +++---
>  meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass    |  4 +--
>  meta/classes/image-buildinfo.bbclass |  4 +--
>  meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass    | 43 ++--------------------------
>  meta/lib/oe/buildcfg.py              | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/lib/oe/buildcfg.py
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> index bdb3ac33c67..f59e95fef06 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> @@ -7,12 +7,11 @@ inherit staging
>  inherit mirrors
>  inherit utils
>  inherit utility-tasks
> -inherit metadata_scm
>  inherit logging
>  
>  OE_EXTRA_IMPORTS ?= ""
>  
> -OE_IMPORTS += "os sys time oe.path oe.utils oe.types oe.package 
> oe.packagegroup oe.sstatesig oe.lsb oe.cachedpath oe.license oe.qa 
> oe.reproducible oe.rust ${OE_EXTRA_IMPORTS}"
> +OE_IMPORTS += "os sys time oe.path oe.utils oe.types oe.package 
> oe.packagegroup oe.sstatesig oe.lsb oe.cachedpath oe.license oe.qa 
> oe.reproducible oe.rust oe.buildcfg ${OE_EXTRA_IMPORTS}"
>  OE_IMPORTS[type] = "list"
>  
>  PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS ??= ""
> @@ -35,6 +34,8 @@ def oe_import(d):
>  # We need the oe module name space early (before INHERITs get added)
>  OE_IMPORTED := "${@oe_import(d)}"
>  
> +inherit metadata_scm
> +
>  def lsb_distro_identifier(d):
>      adjust = d.getVar('LSB_DISTRO_ADJUST')
>      adjust_func = None
> @@ -219,8 +220,8 @@ def get_source_date_epoch_value(d):
>  def get_layers_branch_rev(d):
>      layers = (d.getVar("BBLAYERS") or "").split()
>      layers_branch_rev = ["%-20s = \"%s:%s\"" % (os.path.basename(i), \
> -        base_get_metadata_git_branch(i, None).strip(), \
> -        base_get_metadata_git_revision(i, None)) \
> +        oe.buildcfg.get_metadata_git_branch(i, None).strip(), \
> +        oe.buildcfg.get_metadata_git_revision(i, None)) \
>              for i in layers]
>      i = len(layers_branch_rev)-1
>      p1 = layers_branch_rev[i].find("=")
> diff --git a/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass 
> b/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
> index 4345ffc6939..f2493b3765a 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
> @@ -761,8 +761,8 @@ def buildhistory_get_metadata_revs(d):
>      # We want an easily machine-readable format here, so 
> get_layers_branch_rev isn't quite what we want
>      layers = (d.getVar("BBLAYERS") or "").split()
>      medadata_revs = ["%-17s = %s:%s%s" % (os.path.basename(i), \
> -        base_get_metadata_git_branch(i, None).strip(), \
> -        base_get_metadata_git_revision(i, None), \
> +        oe.buildcfg.get_metadata_git_branch(i, None).strip(), \
> +        oe.buildcfg.get_metadata_git_revision(i, None), \
>          buildhistory_get_modified(i)) \
>              for i in layers]
>      return '\n'.join(medadata_revs)
> diff --git a/meta/classes/image-buildinfo.bbclass 
> b/meta/classes/image-buildinfo.bbclass
> index 94c585d4cd9..25ca8d8fe6b 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/image-buildinfo.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/image-buildinfo.bbclass
> @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ def get_layer_git_status(path):
>  def get_layer_revs(d):
>      layers = (d.getVar("BBLAYERS") or "").split()
>      medadata_revs = ["%-17s = %s:%s %s" % (os.path.basename(i), \
> -        base_get_metadata_git_branch(i, None).strip(), \
> -        base_get_metadata_git_revision(i, None), \
> +        oe.buildcfg.get_metadata_git_branch(i, None).strip(), \
> +        oe.buildcfg.get_metadata_git_revision(i, None), \
>          get_layer_git_status(i)) \
>              for i in layers]
>      return '\n'.join(medadata_revs)
> diff --git a/meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass 
> b/meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass
> index 47cb969b8d8..f646b3159a4 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass
> @@ -1,44 +1,5 @@
> -def base_detect_revision(d):
> -    path = base_get_scmbasepath(d)
> -    return base_get_metadata_git_revision(path, d)
>  
> -def base_detect_branch(d):
> -    path = base_get_scmbasepath(d)
> -    return base_get_metadata_git_branch(path, d)

This causes failures because there still a user of base_detect_branch()
in meta/classes/report-error.bbclass

NameError: name 'base_detect_branch' is not defined

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/113/builds/2527/steps/13/logs/stdio

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#166806): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/166806
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/91643180/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to