Hello,
On 14-05-2022 12:46, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 22:59 -0700, Sundeep KOKKONDA wrote:
[Yocto bug #14742]
The build shows below error while building for arm machines.
Exception: TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a 
number, not 'NoneType'
Detailed error info :

Steps to reproduce:
1. Set MACHINE ?= "qemuarm" in local.conf & add 'TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK:append = " 
packagegroup-rust-cross-canadian-${MACHINE}"'
2. bitbake core-image-minimal -cpopulate_sdk

Complete Error:
ERROR: rust-cross-canadian-arm-1.59.0-r0 do_rust_gen_targets: Error executing a 
python function in exec_func_python() autogenerated:
The stack trace of python calls that resulted in this exception/failure was:
File: 'exec_func_python() autogenerated', lineno: 2, function: <module>
      0001:
  *** 0002:do_rust_gen_targets(d)
      0003:
File: 
'/ala-lpggp31/skokkonda/yocto/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-cross-canadian-common.inc',
 lineno: 31, function: do_rust_gen_targets
      0027:
      0028:LLVM_TARGET[x86_64] = "${RUST_HOST_SYS}"
      0029:python do_rust_gen_targets () {
      0030:    wd = d.getVar('WORKDIR') + '/targets/'
  *** 0031:    rust_gen_target(d, 'TARGET', wd, d.getVar('TARGET_LLVM_FEATURES') or 
"", d.getVar('TARGET_LLVM_CPU'), d.getVar('TARGET_ARCH'))
      0032:    rust_gen_target(d, 'HOST', wd, "", "generic", 
d.getVar('HOST_ARCH'))
      0033:    rust_gen_target(d, 'BUILD', wd, "", "generic", 
d.getVar('BUILD_ARCH'))
      0034:}
      0035:
File: 
'/ala-lpggp31/skokkonda/yocto/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc', 
lineno: 330, function: rust_gen_target
      0326:    # build tspec
      0327:    tspec = {}
      0328:    tspec['llvm-target'] = d.getVarFlag('LLVM_TARGET', arch_abi)
      0329:    tspec['data-layout'] = d.getVarFlag('DATA_LAYOUT', arch_abi)
  *** 0330:    tspec['max-atomic-width'] = int(d.getVarFlag('MAX_ATOMIC_WIDTH', 
arch_abi))
      0331:    tspec['target-pointer-width'] = 
d.getVarFlag('TARGET_POINTER_WIDTH', arch_abi)
      0332:    tspec['target-c-int-width'] = d.getVarFlag('TARGET_C_INT_WIDTH', 
arch_abi)
      0333:    tspec['target-endian'] = d.getVarFlag('TARGET_ENDIAN', arch_abi)
      0334:    tspec['arch'] = arch_to_rust_target_arch(rust_arch)
Exception: TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a 
number, not 'NoneType'

Below are the local variables from rust_gen_target function for arm and aarch64 
targets. Refer below, the tspec varibles for 'arm' generated with NoneType.
(a) Locals at rust_gen_target for arm::
tspec['data-layout'] =  None, Type of tspec['data-layout'] =  <class 'NoneType'>
tspec['data-layout'] =  None, Type of tspec['data-layout'] =  <class 'NoneType'>
DEBUG: Python function do_rust_gen_targets finished
(b) Locals at rust_gen_target  for aarch64::
tspec['data-layout'] =  aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu, Type of tspec['data-layout'] =  
<class 'str'>
tspec['max-atomic-width'] =  128, Type of tspec['max-atomic-width'] =  <class 
'int'>

Reason for changing arm-eabi to arm: The earlier changes introduced this bug, 
so reverting the change 'arm-eabi' to 'arm' fixed the issue.

The 'rust_gen_targets' Task added with its dependent variable list.

Signed-off-by: Sundeep KOKKONDA<sundeep.kokko...@gmail.com>
---
  meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc | 16 +++++++++-------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc
index 310aecef22..984fe9099e 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc
@@ -119,13 +119,13 @@ def llvm_features(d):
## arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
-DATA_LAYOUT[arm-eabi] = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
-LLVM_TARGET[arm-eabi] = "${RUST_TARGET_SYS}"
-TARGET_ENDIAN[arm-eabi] = "little"
-TARGET_POINTER_WIDTH[arm-eabi] = "32"
-TARGET_C_INT_WIDTH[arm-eabi] = "32"
-MAX_ATOMIC_WIDTH[arm-eabi] = "64"
-FEATURES[arm-eabi] = "+v6,+vfp2"
+DATA_LAYOUT[arm] = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
+LLVM_TARGET[arm] = "${RUST_TARGET_SYS}"
+TARGET_ENDIAN[arm] = "little"
+TARGET_POINTER_WIDTH[arm] = "32"
+TARGET_C_INT_WIDTH[arm] = "32"
+MAX_ATOMIC_WIDTH[arm] = "64"
+FEATURES[arm] = "+v6,+vfp2"
## armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
  DATA_LAYOUT[armv7-eabi] = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
@@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ def rust_gen_target(d, thing, wd, features, cpu, arch, 
abi=""):
      with open(wd + sys + '.json', 'w') as f:
          json.dump(tspec, f, indent=4)
+do_rust_gen_targets[vardeps] += "DATA_LAYOUT LLVM_TARGET TARGET_ENDIAN TARGET_POINTER_WIDTH TARGET_C_INT_WIDTH MAX_ATOMIC_WIDTH FEATURES"
+
  python do_rust_gen_targets () {
      wd = d.getVar('WORKDIR') + '/targets/'
      build_arch = d.getVar('BUILD_ARCH')
We need to split this into two. One patch to fix the determinism issue,
the other to fix the arm bug.

The "good" news is that this patch now fails consistently on the
autobuilder, for example:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/80/builds/3522

sstatetests.SStateTests.test_sstate_allarch_samesigs is failing which
you can rerun with:

oe-selftest -r sstatetests.SStateTests.test_sstate_allarch_samesigs

Now it fails reliably, we need to work out why the arm change breaks
that.

If you split the patches into two we can likely merge the
reproducibility one, then onwards with the arm issue.

In case it isn't clear, the failing signatures are for adwaita-icon-
theme which depends on librsvg-native which depends on rust-native.
What this means is that the signature of rust-native is changing when
MACHINE is changed in that test. This shouldn't happen. We already knew
that from our other discussion but now we can prove it. It would be
nice if a test showed us the native hash was changing and that is the
other issue we discussed but one step at a time!

To be clear, rust-native (and it's signature) should be independent of
MACHINE so we need to fix that. This means that currently rust-native
varies and rebuilds when you change MACHINE (after the dependency fix
in this patch).

Hello Richard,

I analyzed the test failure and it is because of the newly added dependency on variable LLVM_TARGET. In think the patch split will not help here. We need to understand the reason for the introduced change in first place from 'arm' to 'arm-eabi' & why the rust_gen_target is not added dependency on these variables.

Hello Alex,

We need a few inputs from you regarding a 'arm' bug which is in discussion in this patch.

The changes in file /meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-common.inc/ with commit ID '/d6b563710e6cc0857843433d85023d47f9f2037d/' are causing the build error with 'arm' architecture (the /tspec /variables returning '/NoneType/') when  '/TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK:append = " packagegroup-rust-cross-canadian-${MACHINE}/" added in /local.conf/ (See the detailed build error at beginning of this email).

And to fix that error the changes for '/arm/' architecture are reverted (#arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf variables reverted to '/arm/' from '/arm-eabi/') and the build error is solved. But, because no Task is depending on these variables, /bitbake /is unable to detect these changes while rebuilding (In other words, the Sstate-cache sigdata is not changed). So, the rust_gen_target task dependency to these variables are added and then the Sstate sigdata is updated with rebuild. However, the dependency (on variable LLVM_TARGET) is causing the failure in /oe-selftest test_sstate_allarch_samesigs/ testcase.

Can you let us know is it the right thing to add these variable dependencies for rust_gen_target task? And, to fix the 'arm NoneType' error is it the correct fix to revert the '/arm-eabi/' to '/arm/'?

Let me know if anything is not clear.

Below is the dependency list taken from /bitbake-diffsigs/ from the /test_sstate_allarch_samesigs/ test sigdata for x86_64 & qemuarm machines. The change in sigdata caused by differed values for variable TUNE_FEATURES{callconvention-hard}.
=================
...
List of dependencies for variable LLVM_TARGET[aarch64] is ['RUST_TARGET_SYS']
List of dependencies for variable LLVM_TARGET[arm] is ['RUST_TARGET_SYS']
...
List of dependencies for variable RUST_TARGET_SYS is ['rust_base_triple']
...
List of dependencies for variable rust_base_triple is ['determine_libc', 'target_is_armv7']
...
List of dependencies for variable determine_libc is ['BUILD_SYS', 'HOST_SYS', 'RUST_LIBC', 'RUST_LIBC:class-native']    # The determine_libc is using the TUNE_FEATURES
List of dependencies for variable target_is_armv7 is []
...
TUNE_FEATURES{callconvention-hard} = *Unset *#in x86_64
TUNE_FEATURES{callconvention-hard} = *Set *#in qemuarm
...
====================


Thanks,
Sundeep K.



Cheers,

Richard

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#165881): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/165881
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/91074788/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to