On Feb 1, 2012 11:49 AM, "Otavio Salvador" <ota...@ossystems.com.br<mailto:ota...@ossystems.com.br>> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:07, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <b29...@freescale.com<mailto:b29...@freescale.com>> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Khem Raj >> <raj.k...@gmail.com<mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > patchwork instance that we have currently handles patches for >> > oe-devel, oe-core and bitbake >> > layers which use oe-devel maintain and use the patch queues ok so it >> > makes sense to have it >> > there. But patch flow for oe-core and bitbake is handled differently >> > via pull requests. Would it >> > make sense to turn it off for these two projects. Is someone using >> > patchwork and/or finds >> > it useful to have the patchwork catch those patches please let me know >> >> Patchworks is useful for pulling patches into a git repo and having >> discussion on a patch documented. I don't think it should just be >> turned off, it can be left there for all the see and use. > > > The major issue with it is the burden work of keeping it clean regarding of > the merged patches. Otherwise it ends being useless due the amount of not > archived patches
I'm saying leave it there even if its not maintained. I can still go search for patches sent by me or other specific people. -M > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br<mailto:ota...@ossystems.com.br> > http://www.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org<mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
