On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> This would imply that we need to have a GPLv2 Version of the gnupg > recipe also, Steve if you had to look at or handle the newer GPLv3 gnupg > code itself, you may not be able to write the GPLv2 recipe or create patches > for it, can you arrange for someone to create that patch? OE-classic has a recipe for gnupg-1.4.10, so perhaps the safest approach would be to import that recipe since I *have* browsed the gnupg v2 code. I know from experience that signed repositories won't work for that version as-is. Zypper explicitly uses gpg2. It *may* be that gpg and gpg2 are compatible enough that you could get away with a symlink and a v1.x version of gnupg. Or perhaps one could patch zypper to try gpg if gpg2 isn't present. Thoughts? Steve _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
