On 01/24/2012 03:42 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Joshua Lock<j...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
Long term we should look at moving perf to a separate recipe but as a
short term solution this patch will ensure that when GPLv3 is in
would I be asking too much to do that instead of this patch :)
I think it will be good thing in general since other layers
now have to define these tasks if they inherit from oe-core kernel class.
Khem,
The issue is timing and resources to do this work, it a larger task that
may take more than a few days to refactor perf into it's own recipe and
share the source area (ala work-shared/gcc). We need to get the
non-GPLv3 build working again and this seems like the most direct route
to accomplish that.
Sau!
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
