On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 21:33, Peter Kjellerstedt <
peter.kjellerst...@axis.com> wrote:

> Thinking a bit more about this though, I am not sure I can win. We have
> had a corresponding local patch for many years, and it seems natural to
> have the link only in /usr/lib/systemd/system. However, for a system that
> uses package management (which we do not), it may not be as natural,
> since then updating the systemd package in runtime would restore systemd's
> default.target rather than the one that was installed with the system.
>
> Would you accept a patch that instead introduces a variable for the path
> to the default.target link, with the following definition:
>
> SYSTEMD_DEFAULT_TARGET_PATH ?= "${@bb.utils.contains('IMAGE_FEATURES',
> 'package-management', '${sysconfdir}/systemd/system',
> '${systemd_system_unitdir}', d}"
>
> That would make it reasonably sane by default, but still allow it to be
> overridden if you have other ideas for your system.
>

I think you can mark certain files as 'configuration' and then package
management won't touch them during updates?

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#160379): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/160379
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/88325758/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to