Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerst...@axis.com> escreveu no dia quinta,
23/12/2021 à(s) 10:49:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org <
> openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Richard Purdie
> > Sent: den 23 december 2021 00:21
> > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] base/patch: Disable network for
> unpack/patch/configure/compile/install
> >
> > Use the newly added nonetwork task flag to disable network access where
> > possible in unpack/patch/configure/compile/install tasks.
> >
> > We can't disable networking in sstate tasks due to sstate downloads and
> > also so we can report hash equivalence to the server.
>
> Since no tasks except fetch (and apparently the sstate tasks) are expected
> to use the network, wouldn't it make more sense to reverse this flag?
> I.e.,
> add do_fetch[network] = "1" instead. That way you don't get away with
> adding some random task and using the network from it unless you
> explicitly
> state that you will.
>
It is more safe and easy to check what are the tasks that need network
access.
Jose
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > meta/classes/base.bbclass | 4 ++++
> > meta/classes/patch.bbclass | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> > index b709777f243..e4c6c983b59 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> > @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ python create_source_date_epoch_stamp() {
> > oe.reproducible.epochfile_write(source_date_epoch,
> d.getVar('SDE_FILE'), d)
> > }
> > do_unpack[postfuncs] += "create_source_date_epoch_stamp"
> > +do_unpack[nonetwork] = "1"
> >
> > def get_source_date_epoch_value(d):
> > return oe.reproducible.epochfile_read(d.getVar('SDE_FILE'), d)
> > @@ -358,6 +359,7 @@ base_do_configure() {
> > echo ${BB_TASKHASH} > ${CONFIGURESTAMPFILE}
> > fi
> > }
> > +do_configure[nonetwork] = "1"
> >
> > addtask compile after do_configure
> > do_compile[dirs] = "${B}"
> > @@ -368,11 +370,13 @@ base_do_compile() {
> > bbnote "nothing to compile"
> > fi
> > }
> > +do_compile[nonetwork] = "1"
> >
> > addtask install after do_compile
> > do_install[dirs] = "${B}"
> > # Remove and re-create ${D} so that is it guaranteed to be empty
> > do_install[cleandirs] = "${D}"
> > +do_install[nonetwork] = "1"
> >
> > base_do_install() {
> > :
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/patch.bbclass b/meta/classes/patch.bbclass
> > index 8de70254919..57aaf7c31d1 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/patch.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/patch.bbclass
> > @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ patch_do_patch[vardepsexclude] = "PATCHRESOLVE"
> >
> > addtask patch after do_unpack
> > do_patch[dirs] = "${WORKDIR}"
> > +do_patch[nonetwork] = "1"
> > do_patch[depends] = "${PATCHDEPENDENCY}"
> >
> > EXPORT_FUNCTIONS do_patch
> > --
> > 2.32.0
>
> //Peter
>
>
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
José Quaresma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#159988):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/159988
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87909311/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
