On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 05:58:42PM +0000, Tom Hochstein wrote:
> Thanks Alex. @Otavio<mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> pushed the 
> hardest for the use case and I don't really have anything to add. Given that 
> Pekka has suggested that there is a better approach without weston-launch, 
> it seems that removing the patch is fine. In the worst case we can backport 
> the patch to meta-freescale until we have a new solution.

I would agree - if upstream supports our use case differently, we should 
probably switch to using it and drop the patch. That would be less burden 
updating it between the versions...

-- 
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964
Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186  6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#158587): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158587
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87003161/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to