On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 05:58:42PM +0000, Tom Hochstein wrote: > Thanks Alex. @Otavio<mailto:otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> pushed the > hardest for the use case and I don't really have anything to add. Given that > Pekka has suggested that there is a better approach without weston-launch, > it seems that removing the patch is fine. In the worst case we can backport > the patch to meta-freescale until we have a new solution.
I would agree - if upstream supports our use case differently, we should probably switch to using it and drop the patch. That would be less burden updating it between the versions... -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#158587): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158587 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87003161/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-