On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:11 AM Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I hack on elfutils upstream. > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 06:32:40PM +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 18:15, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Rework support for error() on non-glibc targets: > > > > upstream now provides its own implementation, so we can drop > > > > the patch that adds ours; said implementation isn't > > > > build-tested with tests, so ptest has to be disabled on musl. > > > > > > Overall this is an improvement so I am good with this patch. > > > if upstream implementation does not pass ptests > > > perhaps worth reporting upstream. > > > > I would if upstream would be interested in tests with anything except > > glibc, but I'm fairly sure they're not. The tests don't even build with > > musl without invasive patching. > > If you don't report issues we won't know there are any. elfutils > upstream is certainly focussed on glibc. And some of the musl > developers are pretty hostile and agresssive, which certainly isn't > appreciated. But we do appreciate bug reports and patches to support > alternative libc implementations where they make sense and help > others.
Thanks Mark, good point about creating bug reports at least. > > Cheers, > > Mark >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#158456): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158456 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87121996/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
