On 11/4/21 3:43 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 20:00 +0000, Jose Quaresma wrote:
Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu no dia quinta,
28/10/2021 à(s) 21:58:
On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 08:47 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:41 PM Jose Quaresma <quaresma.j...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
There are any plans or is it possible to backport the SBOM/SPDX to the
dunfell branch?
I'm going to yield to Saul as to whether he thinks this is
desirable/possible or not.
The packagedata changes are pretty invasive unfortunately and likely not
something you're going to want in dunfell sadly.
Thanks for the clarification.
I have been thinking a bit more about this. I did wonder if we should consider a
mixin layer of some kind for it that could work with dunfell?
We could host it, it is just a question of writing the mixin layer and
maintaining it.
I don't think it's going to be possible with a pure mixin layer, since
it relies on the extended package data?
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#157873):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/157873
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/86616599/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
