On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 11:55 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 20:00, Richard Purdie
> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Do you know why we wouldn't see this issue on the autobuilder tests?
> > 
> > Also, do you plan to submit something upstream? Has this been discussed with
> > them? I'm starting to become reluctant to taking patches marked as "Pending"
> > which just sit in our tree forever...
> > 
> 
> 
> I was also wondering what the issue really is - there needs to be a 
> description
> of how it can be observed at least.

I agree at the very least the patch needs more explanation. In my local build:

tmp/work/x86_64-linux/gcc-cross-x86_64/11.2.0-r0/gcc-11.2.0/build.x86_64-linux.x86_64-poky-linux/gcc$
 cat checksum-options 
g++  -no-pie   -isystem/host/usr/include -O2 -pipe -DIN_GCC  
-DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE   -fno-exceptions 
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings 
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute 
-Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros 
-Wno-overlength-strings   -DHAVE_CONFIG_H 
-static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -L/host/usr/lib                         
-L/host/lib                         
-Wl,--enable-new-dtags                         -Wl,-rpath-link,/host/usr/lib    
                     
-Wl,-rpath-link,/host/lib                         -Wl,-rpath,/host/usr/lib      
                   
-Wl,-rpath,/host/lib                         -Wl,-O1 
-Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined 
-Wl,--dynamic-linker=/media/build1/poky/build/tmp/sysroots-uninative/x86_64-linux/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2

so at least in my local build, the problem would appear to be the uninative 
dynamic linker path?

Oleksiy:
> I am not familiar how tests preformed in your case.
> How we check it. We build gcc native (sdk A) and use this gcc to build 
> packages from sdk A. The same is for sdk B.
> Binaries for gcc from sdk A and B are different.

Are you saying that the two sdks generate different binaries? Or that the gcc
binaries in the two SDKs are different and shouldn't be?

I think we don't compare SDK binaries right now so that might be why our tests
don't see that ("oe-selftest -r reproducible" or see 
lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/reproducibile.py).

Cheers,

Richard


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#157585): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/157585
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/86628472/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to