On Fri, 2021-09-17 at 17:47 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 15/09/2021 13:31:07+0200, Kristian Klausen via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > Den Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:48:18 +0200 skrev Quentin Schulz: > > > Hi Kristian, > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:23:08PM +0200, Kristian Klausen via > > > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > > > The TPM2 support is used, among other things, for unlocking encrypted > > > > volumes. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kristian Klausen <krist...@klausen.dk> > > > > --- > > > > meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_249.3.bb | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_249.3.bb > > > > b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_249.3.bb > > > > index c027b88fd6..f8c85dabf0 100644 > > > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_249.3.bb > > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_249.3.bb > > > > @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ PACKAGECONFIG[bzip2] = > > > > "-Dbzip2=true,-Dbzip2=false,bzip2" > > > > PACKAGECONFIG[cgroupv2] = > > > > "-Ddefault-hierarchy=unified,-Ddefault-hierarchy=hybrid" > > > > PACKAGECONFIG[coredump] = "-Dcoredump=true,-Dcoredump=false" > > > > PACKAGECONFIG[cryptsetup] = > > > > "-Dlibcryptsetup=true,-Dlibcryptsetup=false,cryptsetup,,cryptsetup" > > > > +PACKAGECONFIG[tpm2] = "-Dtpm2=true,-Dtpm2=false,tpm2-tss,tpm2-tss > > > > libtss2 libtss2-tcti-device" > > > > > > Shouldn't the RDEPENDS part of the PACKAGECONFIG be pulled in > > > automatically by Bitbake since I assume the libs they contained are used > > > by the linker for systemd? > > > > > > Also looking at the tpm2-tss recipe, I'm not sure there's a package > > > named libtss2-tcti-device? > > > > Are we looking at the same recipe? It is defined in > > tpm2-tss_3.0.3.bb[1]. > > > > [1] > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-security/tree/meta-tpm/recipes-tpm2/tpm2-tss/tpm2-tss_3.0.3.bb?id=e0fca90835169e21ffabe6f2e4b901678236d36e#n37 > > > > Then, shouldn't that be a bbappend in meta-security? Else, you run the > risk of pulling a dependency for a recipe in a layer you don't have.
Even if the dependency is in another layer, we've been moving towards having the PACKAGECONFIG in the main recipe with the default as not enabled. This means the correct "disable" configure options are added explicitly. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#156142): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/156142 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85623932/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
