This will result in a behavior change, making it so `bitbake gcc-runtime`
will run the check task. Are there implications to this?
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:04 PM <bkyleruss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Otherwise, when rm_work is used, do_check may not execute before rm_work
> causing do_check failures if the workdir has been removed underneath it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Russell <bkyleruss...@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> index 59d9a24686..607971adca 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> @@ -314,5 +314,5 @@ do_check() {
>
> oe_runmake -i ${MAKE_CHECK_TARGETS}
> RUNTESTFLAGS="${MAKE_CHECK_RUNTESTFLAGS}"
> }
> -addtask check after do_compile do_populate_sysroot
> +addtask check after do_compile do_populate_sysroot before do_build
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>
>
>
--
Christopher Larson
kergoth at gmail dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#154290):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154290
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84557001/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
