On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:49:17 -0700
Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the caller only cares about yes/no then how about returning 1/0
> instead of a pointer?
Other callers are actually using the response, because the pseudo_msg_t*
returned from this is how, say, OP_STAT responds with the stat
information it got from the server. It's just chroot, specifically, that
wants to know that the client accepted-and-processed the chroot, but
there's no meaningful additional information past that.
I suppose in theory pseudo_client_op could be split into one function
for ops with message returns and another for ops with only
success/failure, or "just ignored", but it doesn't seem rewarding.
In Go, I'd probably have done it as
func (c *PseudoClient) Op(whatever goes here) (*Message, error)
and this would just be returning (nil, nil) or (nil,
some-meaningful-error) in the chroot case, but here we are in C with
single return values. :)
-s
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#154219):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154219
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84479678/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
