On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 10:17 PM Diego Santa Cruz via
lists.openembedded.org
<diego.santacruz=spinetix....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> Any news on this one? I have been doing our own builds with the equivalent of
> that patch for our BSPs with a linux-intel derived kernel recipe plus another
> internal kernel recipe (both using kernel.bbclass) and I have not found any
> issues with it.
This is in the group of patches I am currently testing. So far it looks good.
Steve
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Sakoman <sako...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 30 April 2021 20:46
> > To: Diego Santa Cruz <diego.santac...@spinetix.com>
> > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mark Hatle
> > <mark.ha...@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Subject: Re: [OE-core] Unihash warning building kernels in Yocto 3.1.7
> >
> > Trying again with Mark's correct email address!
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:43 AM Steve Sakoman <sako...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 7:00 AM Diego Santa Cruz via
> > > lists.openembedded.org
> > > <diego.santacruz=spinetix....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I just updated to Yocto 3.1.7 (from 3.1.5) and I got the following
> > > > warning
> > while building a kernel recipe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > do_install: Task do_install requested do_package unihash, but it was
> > > > not
> > available
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I tracked this down to OE-Core commit
> > 0c28edf4bf0d2f92bf3a47406041c63acd90bacf ("package.bbclass: hash
> > equivalency and pr service") and it makes sense since do_package runs after
> > do_install and in dunfell we can find the following in kernel.bbclass
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > do_install[prefuncs] += "package_get_auto_pr"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Merging OE-Core commit 36fe4db8ae827a93abe9fce6740459d215411965
> > ("kernel.bbclass: Remove do_install[prefunc] no longer needed") should
> > normally solve this warning by removing the above line, but I do not know if
> > that change is safe in dunfell.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could that be merged in? Or is there something else that could be done
> > to avoid the warning?
> > >
> > > I can do some testing with that patch. cc-ing Mark to see if he has
> > > any comments since he is the patch author.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > > Our build system flags a production build as bad if there is a warning,
> > > > so
> > this is kind of annoying.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Diego
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Diego Santa Cruz, PhD
> > > > Technology Architect
> > > > spinetix.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#151395):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/151395
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/82486749/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
