If iterating a layer with multiple components and auto-adding dependencies
the tests can break since layers are never removed and order isn't guaranteed
to account for that.

Fix this by resetting the layer list back to the original list each time
before auto-adding the dependencies in each case.

This fixes scanning of meta-openembedded in particular where the sublayers
may not be added in order of minimal dependency.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 scripts/yocto-check-layer | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/yocto-check-layer b/scripts/yocto-check-layer
index b7c83c8b543..deba3cb4f8c 100755
--- a/scripts/yocto-check-layer
+++ b/scripts/yocto-check-layer
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ def main():
                 layer['type'] == LayerType.ERROR_BSP_DISTRO:
             continue
 
+        # Reset to a clean backup copy for each run
+        shutil.copyfile(bblayersconf + '.backup', bblayersconf)
+
         if check_bblayers(bblayersconf, layer['path'], logger):
             logger.info("%s already in %s. To capture initial signatures, 
layer under test should not present "
                "in BBLAYERS. Please remove %s from BBLAYERS." % 
(layer['name'], bblayersconf, layer['name']))
-- 
2.30.2

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#150885): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/150885
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/82334478/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to