On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:36 AM Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 14:26, Colin Finck <c.fi...@enlyze.com> wrote:
>> Who decides about backporting or not backporting dosfstools 4.2 to Dunfell? >> I can only stress again that a large number of devices in the wild are >> currently running on FAT boot partitions, and come with a dosfschk version >> that likes to destroy these boot partitions. > That would be Steve. It's best if you cherry-pick the needed patches into > current dunfell tip, and send them here with [dunfell] prefix, adding the > rationale to the commit messages. Yes, please cherry-pick the required patches onto dunfell and send to the list with as much justification as possible (and highlight any downsides). SInce this may result in failures in other layers I want this proposed change to get as much review as possible. Thanks! Steve
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#148892): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/148892 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/80974296/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
