On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Joshua Lock <[email protected]> wrote: > We have witnessed non-deterministic failures of perf for some platforms > whilst looking for bfd.h, a header provided by binutils. > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > index 950f197..aa45dba 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ addtask install_perf after do_install before do_package > do_compile_perf[umask] = 022 > do_install_perf[umask] = 022 > > -PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot > ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot" > +PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot > ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot > ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot"
Does this build the rpm for binutils too? I've seen the following error recently when creating the rfs: | error: Failed dependencies: | binutils >= 2.21.1a is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds | libbfd-2.21.1.so is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
