On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 08:51 +0800, Zhai, Edwin wrote: > On 01/04/2012 07:56 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 12/29/2011 12:09 AM, edwin.z...@intel.com wrote: > >> From: Zhai Edwin<edwin.z...@intel.com> > >> > >> All, > >> Patch of gnome-keyring to fix gsettings-data-convert seg fault, > >> modified according to Saul's comments. > >> Another patch of matchbox-wm to remove the dependence between window > >> manager and X session. > >> > >> The following changes since commit > >> 6a1b5c28f22bb07a0b7102eb88441d05768ec52e: > >> > >> self-hosted-image: Add builder user and mini X (2011-12-29 10:42:07 > >> +0800) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib gzhai/build-appliance2 > >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=gzhai/build-appliance2 > >> > >> > >> Zhai Edwin (2): > >> gnome-keyring: fix gsettings_data_convert seg fault > > > > Merged this one to OE-Core > > > >> matchbox-wm: Remove x-session-manager handling > >> > > We need a little more explaintion about why you are removing the U-A > > code from the matchbox-wm? > > matchbox-wm should not handles x-session, or else it conflict with > mini-x-session. i.e. mini-x-session set x-session to mini-X, then > matchbox-wm overrides it as matchbox-session. Without matchbox-session > installed, mini-X fail start. > > I have tested this patch and found no regression...
What I don't understand is that this is using update-alternatives so surely you can just install an alternative that overrides this? Looking at the code, shouldn't we move this alternative to the matchbox-session recipe? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
