On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 22:20 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> > > This fixes a problem with the uptime utility: > > root@beagleboneA3-0088:/var/lib/cloud9# busybox uptime > 16:00:17 up 2 days, 6:46, load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.05 > root@beagleboneA3-0088:/var/lib/cloud9# uptime.procps > 16:00:22 up 2 days, 6:46, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.05, 0.06 > root@beagleboneA3-0088:/var/lib/cloud9# uptime.coreutils > 16:00pm up 4382 days 15:58, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.05, 0.05 > root@beagleboneA3-0088:/var/lib/cloud9# ls /usr/bin/uptime -la > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Dec 26 08:56 /usr/bin/uptime -> uptime.coreutils
If the coreutils uptime is broken (and assuming it isn't straightforward to fix) then I would have thought the right thing would be to reduce the priority of that one alternative rather than increasing all the others to be higher. Or just stop coreutils shipping uptime altogether I suppose. But, anyway, patching procps to work around a bug in coreutils seems like the wrong thing. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
