On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 17:35 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 11:59 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > That code block isn't particularly complex and it is self contained, > > so really, there's not much to see there. But I'm not in the business > > of predicting anything, I'm in the wait and see camp (AUH will be the > > first to pick it up if it causes patch problems, etc). > > > > Richard can either take the change or not, I'm just supporting how > > it has currently been submitted as chances are that no further > > revisions are coming from Paul, so it can live or die as-is. > > Even if a patch was preferred to a config, the current patch changes > too much and should really be reduced in scope, as commented in the > other email.
Doing this with a patch is probably 'safer' or less ugly than the other options. I had meant to test this whilst as the same time, suggest we reduce the context in the patch as mentioned, then merge. Unfortunately I confused the systemd patches and this has sneaked in without that tweak. If we could reduce the noise in the diff, that would be useful though. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#146903): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146903 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79695930/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
