Does deb/rpm packaging already have this feature?
Alex
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 13:45, Michael Ho <michael...@bmw.de> wrote:
> From: Michael Ho <michael...@bmw.de>
>
> Switch do_populate_sdk for the ipk package manager to use a separate target
> opkg config file and separate the lockfiles restricting do_rootfs and
> do_populate_sdk from running in parallel.
>
> This way if an image recipe includes a dependency to do_populate_sdk by
> default then it will run in parallel to do_rootfs saving time compared to
> the
> sequential execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ho <michael...@bmw.de>
> ---
> meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 1 +
> meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 4 ++--
> meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> index 79cb36c..d31dba0 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ IMAGE_PKGTYPE ?= "ipk"
>
> IPKGCONF_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg.conf"
> IPKGCONF_SDK = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk.conf"
> +IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk-target.conf"
>
> PKGWRITEDIRIPK = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-ipks"
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
> b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
> index f1e0219..245c256 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
> @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ do_rootfs[recrdeptask] += "do_package_write_ipk
> do_package_qa"
> do_rootfs[vardeps] += "PACKAGE_FEED_URIS PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS
> PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS"
>
> do_rootfs[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock"
> -do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock"
> -do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock"
> +do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock"
> +do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock"
>
> OPKG_PREPROCESS_COMMANDS = ""
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py
> b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py
> index 37af034..e2ca415 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py
> @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ class PkgSdk(Sdk):
> def __init__(self, d, manifest_dir=None):
> super(PkgSdk, self).__init__(d, manifest_dir)
>
> + # In sdk_list_installed_packages the call to opkg is hardcoded to
> + # always use IPKGCONF_TARGET and there's no exposed API to change
> this
> + # so simply override IPKGCONF_TARGET to use this separated config
> file.
> + ipkgconf_sdk_target = d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET")
> + d.setVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET", ipkgconf_sdk_target)
> +
> self.target_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET")
> self.host_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK")
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#146590):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146590
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79594382/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
