This actually fails yocto-check-layer script for Yocto compliance 
checking, when a layer provides own licenses via LICENSE_PATH 
(in layer.conf - LICENSE_PATH += "${LAYERDIR}/licenses"):

Variable AVAILABLE_LICENSES value changed:
...

Is there a new way to provide additional licenses from a layer or 
should the yocto-check-layer script be modified to accomodate 
(i.e. ignore) this change?

-- 
Denys


On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 05:48:13PM +0100, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> Previously, there was SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES, an undocumented
> variable that contained a static list of licenses. It was used by
> expand_wildcard_licenses() to expand any wildcards used in, e.g.,
> INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE. However, since this static list of licenses has
> not been kept up-to-date, many licenses were missing, with the result
> that if one tried to use any of those licenses with a wildcard, no
> licenses would be found, effectively ignoring that they should be
> marked as incompatible.
> 
> This introduces a new (documented) variable, AVAILABLE_LICENSES, that
> is automatically updated to contain all licenses found in any
> directories specified by ${COMMON_LICENSE_DIR} and ${LICENSE_PATH},
> and uses it instead of SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES when expanding
> wildcards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerst...@axis.com>
> ---
> 
> PATCHv2: Correct spelling of 'available'.
> 
>  meta/classes/license.bbclass                  | 27 ++++++++++++++++---
>  meta/conf/documentation.conf                  |  1 +
>  .../oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py   |  6 ++---
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/license.bbclass b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> index 648a4d7892..c388740003 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ def canonical_license(d, license):
>      """
>      Return the canonical (SPDX) form of the license if available (so GPLv3
>      becomes GPL-3.0), for the license named 'X+', return canonical form of
> -    'X' if availabel and the tailing '+' (so GPLv3+ becomes GPL-3.0+), 
> +    'X' if available and the tailing '+' (so GPLv3+ becomes GPL-3.0+),
>      or the passed license if there is no canonical form.
>      """
>      lic = d.getVarFlag('SPDXLICENSEMAP', license) or ""
> @@ -262,10 +262,29 @@ def canonical_license(d, license):
>              lic += '+'
>      return lic or license
>  
> +def available_licenses(d):
> +    """
> +    Return the available licenses by searching the directories specified by
> +    COMMON_LICENSE_DIR and LICENSE_PATH.
> +    """
> +    lic_dirs = ((d.getVar('COMMON_LICENSE_DIR') or '') + ' ' +
> +                (d.getVar('LICENSE_PATH') or '')).split()
> +
> +    licenses = []
> +    for lic_dir in lic_dirs:
> +        licenses += os.listdir(lic_dir)
> +
> +    licenses = sorted(licenses)
> +    return licenses
> +
> +# Only determine the list of all available licenses once. This assumes that 
> any
> +# additions to LICENSE_PATH have been done before this file is parsed.
> +AVAILABLE_LICENSES := "${@' '.join(available_licenses(d))}"
> +
>  def expand_wildcard_licenses(d, wildcard_licenses):
>      """
> -    Return actual spdx format license names if wildcard used. We expand
> -    wildcards from SPDXLICENSEMAP flags and SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES values.
> +    Return actual spdx format license names if wildcards are used. We expand
> +    wildcards from SPDXLICENSEMAP flags and AVAILABLE_LICENSES.
>      """
>      import fnmatch
>      licenses = wildcard_licenses[:]
> @@ -274,7 +293,7 @@ def expand_wildcard_licenses(d, wildcard_licenses):
>          spdxflags = fnmatch.filter(spdxmapkeys, wld_lic)
>          licenses += [d.getVarFlag('SPDXLICENSEMAP', flag) for flag in 
> spdxflags]
>  
> -    spdx_lics = (d.getVar('SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES', False) or '').split()
> +    spdx_lics = d.getVar('AVAILABLE_LICENSES').split()
>      for wld_lic in wildcard_licenses:
>          licenses += fnmatch.filter(spdx_lics, wld_lic)
>  
> diff --git a/meta/conf/documentation.conf b/meta/conf/documentation.conf
> index fca36f3cf6..0b21d1f63e 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/documentation.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/documentation.conf
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ ASSUME_SHLIBS[doc] = "List of shlib:package[_version] 
> mappings. Useful for lib p
>  AUTHOR[doc] = "Email address used to contact the original author(s) in order 
> to send patches and forward bugs."
>  AUTO_SYSLINUXMENU[doc] = "Enables creating an automatic menu for the 
> syslinux bootloader."
>  AUTOREV[doc] = "When SRCREV is set to the value of this variable, it 
> specifies to use the latest source revision in the repository."
> +AVAILABLE_LICENSES[doc] = "List of licenses found in the directories 
> specified by COMMON_LICENSE_DIR and LICENSE_PATH."
>  
>  #B
>  
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py 
> b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py
> index 904b5b4094..ad878571b5 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py
> @@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ class IncompatibleLicenseTests(OESelftestTestCase):
>          if error_msg not in result.output:
>              raise AssertionError(result.output)
>  
> -    # Verify that a package with an SPDX license (from 
> SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES)
> +    # Verify that a package with an SPDX license (from AVAILABLE_LICENSES)
>      # cannot be built when INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE contains this SPDX license
>      def test_incompatible_spdx_license(self):
>          self.lic_test('incompatible-license', 'GPL-3.0', 'GPL-3.0')
>  
> -    # Verify that a package with an SPDX license (from 
> SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES)
> +    # Verify that a package with an SPDX license (from AVAILABLE_LICENSES)
>      # cannot be built when INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE contains an alias (in
>      # SPDXLICENSEMAP) of this SPDX license
>      def test_incompatible_alias_spdx_license(self):
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ class IncompatibleLicenseTests(OESelftestTestCase):
>          self.lic_test('incompatible-license-alias', 'GPLv3', 'GPLv3')
>  
>      # Verify that a package with a non-SPDX license (neither in
> -    # SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES nor in SPDXLICENSEMAP) cannot be built when
> +    # AVAILABLE_LICENSES nor in SPDXLICENSEMAP) cannot be built when
>      # INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE contains this license
>      def test_incompatible_nonspdx_license(self):
>          self.lic_test('incompatible-nonspdx-license', 'FooLicense', 
> 'FooLicense')
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#141680): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141680
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72389694/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to