On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 11:26 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 22 dec. 2011, om 10:10 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 09:49:01AM +0100, Bernhard Guillon wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> we switched the way we chown /usr/libexec/dbus-daemon-launch-helper > >> with this commit: > >> > >> commit 46e6c3fa8034b12d178d605f3f5d7efe69671a13 > >> Author: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> > >> Date: Fri Oct 21 02:49:51 2011 +0000 > >> > >> dbus: use useradd class to allow use in read-only filesystems > >> > >> Move creation of required user/groups to useradd class thus allowing > >> use with read-only filesystems and booting the initial boot. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> > >> > >> > >> We changed the owner ship of the user on the device before this commit. > >> Now we change the owner ship on build time which is wrong. If we change > >> the owner ship on buildtime we cannot know the gid of the messagebus > >> group. On my system it is e.g 117 but on my targtet it is 997. There is no > >> standard mapping for gid to names so we need to switch back to change the > >> group on the device. > > > > See http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1711 > > but it's still broken in some cases (on my buildhost 3 from 5 machines > > are broken, 2 are working after last opkg changes). > > > > Good test is to enable testlab and run this in your deploy/images directory > > find . ! -type l -name \*tar.gz`; do > > echo $i; > > tar -tvf $i | grep dbus-daemon-launch; > > tar --numeric-owner -tvf $i | grep dbus-daemon-launch; > > tar xzvpf $i ./etc/group; > > grep messagebus ./etc/group; > > done | tee -a image.test > > > > And working image needs to have not only messagebus as owner but also > > matching GID in 2nd line and last line from packaged /etc/group. With > > latest opkg fixes it seems to work, but only if there is messagebus in > > packaged /etc/group at all, reported here: > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-December/014619.html > > but probably got lost in other issues with new opkg, like this one > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-December/014654.html > > (if D is not needed to be set from opkg then why was > > offlineroot_varname.patch > > added in first place? and I have updated this after > > offlineroot_varname.patch removal and new version is in shr branch) > > > >> I can send a patch which reenables the postinstall owner ship change if > >> you like. > > > > Such patch is already on ML from me, now I'm using .bbappend from my > > layer > > http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=meta-smartphone.git;a=commit;h=c08dfd5f5559902f6966648f75d6c6bfd2597a5b > > I'm willing to put that into meta-oe till the problem is 100% fixed.
What I really need is help in understanding what is still breaking. If someone can show me where things are going wrong I can help (and have done so) but "there is a problem somewhere" isn't going to help get this fixed :( Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
