On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:52 -0700, akuster wrote: > If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c > populate_sdk, just print a > warning instead of dumping a trace back > > --- > v2] lets include the missing part of the patch > > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <[email protected]> > --- > meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve- > check.bbclass > index 0889e7544aa..b16da9890af 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass > @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ python cve_save_summary_handler () { > > cve_tmp_file = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_TMP_FILE") > > + if not os.path.isfile(cve_tmp_file): > + bb.warn("File Not found: %s" % cve_tmp_file) > + return > +
A warning is something the user really needs to fix or take some action about. Is this a warning? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#140976): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140976 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75815509/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
