While file has a large inode number, mkfs.ext4 could not parse
hardlink.
$ ls -il rootfs_ota/a rootfs_ota/boot/b rootfs_ota/boot/c
11026675846 -rw-r--r-- 3 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 rootfs_ota/a
11026675846 -rw-r--r-- 3 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 rootfs_ota/boot/b
11026675846 -rw-r--r-- 3 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 rootfs_ota/boot/c
$ truncate -s 1M rootfs_ota.ext4
$ mkfs.ext4 -F -i 8192 rootfs_ota.ext4 -L otaroot -U
fd5f8768-c779-4dc9-adde-165a3d863349 -d rootfs_ota
$ mkdir mnt && sudo mount rootfs_ota.ext4 mnt
$ ls -il mnt/rootfs_ota/a mnt/rootfs_ota/boot/b
12 -rw-r--r-- 1 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 mnt/a
14 -rw-r--r-- 1 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 mnt/boot/b
15 -rw-r--r-- 1 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 mnt/boot/c
After applying this fix
$ ls -il mnt/rootfs_ota/a mnt/rootfs_ota/boot/b
12 -rw-r--r-- 3 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 mnt/a
12 -rw-r--r-- 3 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 mnt/boot/b
12 -rw-r--r-- 3 hjia users 0 Jul 20 17:44 mnt/boot/c
Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu....@windriver.com>
---
...-up-check-for-hardlinks-not-accurate.patch | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
.../e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.45.6.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-fix-up-check-for-hardlinks-not-accurate.patch
diff --git
a/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-fix-up-check-for-hardlinks-not-accurate.patch
b/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-fix-up-check-for-hardlinks-not-accurate.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0a0687651d
--- /dev/null
+++
b/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-fix-up-check-for-hardlinks-not-accurate.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+From c8b243a94a8d2d0a63d353d5d6e91aa6e780e4a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Hongxu Jia <hongxu....@windriver.com>
+Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:53:23 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] fix up check for hardlinks not accurate
+
+Since commit [382ed4a1 e2fsck: use proper types for variables][1]
+applied, the input params `ino' of is_hardlink, it used ext2_ino_t
+instead of ino_t for referencing inode numbers, but it missed to do the
+same thing on `src_ino' which is used to compare with `ino'.
+Comparing between different types may cause the hardlinks check is
+not accurate.
+
+[snip misc/create_inode.c]
+static int is_hardlink(struct hdlinks_s *hdlinks, dev_t dev, ext2_ino_t ino)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < hdlinks->count; i++) {
+ if (hdlinks->hdl[i].src_dev == dev &&
+ hdlinks->hdl[i].src_ino == ino)
+ return i;
+ }
+ return -1;
+}
+[snip misc/create_inode.c]
+
+Change the type of src_ino to ext2_ino_t, the reason why uses ext2_ino_t
+instead of ino_t for referencing inode numbers at [2]
+
+[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git/commit/?id=382ed4a1c2b60acb9db7631e86dda207bde6076e
+[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git/commit/?id=31dbecd482405e0d3a67eb58e1a1c8cb9f2ad83e
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/pull/47]
+Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu....@windriver.com>
+---
+ misc/create_inode.h | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/misc/create_inode.h b/misc/create_inode.h
+index b5eeb420..0561a78a 100644
+--- a/misc/create_inode.h
++++ b/misc/create_inode.h
+@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
+ struct hdlink_s
+ {
+ dev_t src_dev;
+- ino_t src_ino;
++ ext2_ino_t src_ino;
+ ext2_ino_t dst_ino;
+ };
+
+--
+2.18.2
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.45.6.bb
b/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.45.6.bb
index 4ad5b03cac..7b6d2c3b45 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.45.6.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.45.6.bb
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ SRC_URI += "file://remove.ldconfig.call.patch \
file://mkdir_p.patch \
file://0001-configure.ac-correct-AM_GNU_GETTEXT.patch \
file://0001-intl-do-not-try-to-use-gettext-defines-that-no-longe.patch \
+ file://0001-fix-up-check-for-hardlinks-not-accurate.patch \
"
SRC_URI_append_class-native = "
file://e2fsprogs-fix-missing-check-for-permission-denied.patch \
--
2.18.2
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#140808):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140808
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75682913/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
