I am fine with that, please resend with Anuj's rationale included into the commit message.
Alex On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 07:27, Arthur She <arthur....@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Alex, > Would it be a sufficient reason for doing that? > Or any thought could be shared from you? > > Thank you so much, > Arthur > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:16 AM Mittal, Anuj <anuj.mit...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Alex >> >> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 09:04 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: >> > Usually it's the other way around - what is the reason to have this >> > recipe in core? >> > >> >> I had requested Arthur to send this to oe-core since this provides >> a core validation functionality that is needed by all providing DRM >> drivers and is applicable not just to a single arch. >> >> It's a well maintained project and I can keep the recipe updated and >> working. If it can be in oe-core, I can remove it from meta-intel layer >> and avoid having a duplicate recipe. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Anuj >> >> > Alex >> > >> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 06:45, Arthur She <arthur....@linaro.org> >> > wrote: >> > > Hi Alexander and Denys, >> > > Thanks for your feedback. >> > > I have no problem submitting it to meta-oe. >> > > Since the meta-intel maintainer requested to submit it to oe-core, >> > > do you mind sharing some thought about the reason? >> > > >> > > Thank you so much, >> > > Arthur >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:56 AM Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org >> > > > wrote: >> > > > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/topic/74775294 >> > > > >> > > > But I tend to agree. >> > > > >> >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139647): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139647 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74889257/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
