On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 06:31:55PM +0200, Vyacheslav Yurkov wrote: > On 10.06.2020 18:07, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:35:20PM +0200, Vyacheslav Yurkov wrote: > > > ... > > > BIND9 libraries support a lot of options specifically geared towards > > > optimizing DNS operations, many of which do not play nicely with > > > ISC DHCP's "architecture". It isn't necessarily practical to build > > > those libraries for both purposes. > > > ... > > Providing security support for several different copies of the BIND > > code would be a nightmare. > > > > cu > > Adrian > > Right, but I don't think there's a way to build two configurations out of > one recipe, isn't it?
It is possible. More common is sharing the sources between two (or more) recipes with an .inc file. Unrelated to that, I am a bit suprised why the current Yocto setup is suddenly a problem. Other distributions like Debian/Ubuntu are also sharing one build of the BIND libraries between BIND and dhcpd. > Vyacheslav cu Adrian
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139405): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139405 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74797704/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
