On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:18 AM Alexander Kanavin
<alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was thinking of simply dropping the revision from PV, and setting PE to 1
> or so.
>
it seems gitlab is the new location for this so if SVN rev is
redundant info, then perhaps
bumping PE and dropping it from SRCREV is ok.
> Alex
>
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 05:51, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:53 AM Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 at 03:37, Mittal, Anuj <anuj.mit...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > UPSTREAM_CHECK_COMMITS = "1"
>>>> >
>>>> > -SRCREV = "1771b556ee45207f8711744ccbd5d42a3949b14c"
>>>> > +SRCREV = "296494a4011f58f32adc54304a2654627558c59a"
>>>> >
>>>> > PV = "r2991+git${SRCPV}"
>>>>
>>>> PV will also need to be changed in this case to r2999+git${SRCPV}.
>>>
>>>
>>> I wonder if basing PV on svn revisions is still beneficial - we pull
>>> directly from github, rather than svn, and I don't think anyone is
>>> interested in what the svn revision is. Upstream does not tag releases.
>>
>>
>> Since it is set to denote svn rev not updating will add to confusion so
>> please update it
>>>
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#139106):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139106
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74584201/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
