On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:25:31PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 11:59 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 08:50:11AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > asm/bpf_perf_event.h does not exist in older kernels e.g. ( 4.1 ) > > > this helps in using common header across multiple versions of > > > kernel > > > going back > > > > This check should have been there from the beginning and for every > > header > > file. It's big PITA to sync this list up, especially when dealing > > with > > different glibc or kernel than OE-Core, e.g. external toolchains, > > etc. > > > > Any objections to making this check more generic for every entry in > > the list? > > Yes, a strong objection. We don't want to support or encourage every > kernel version out there. > > I also don't understand why people need to change the libc-headers > anyway :(
Richard, I already explained my use-case with external toolchains - those usually come with specific set of libc-headers. And when those don't match the list from OE-Core, it causes problems, trying to support some resemblance of multilib. I believe that got disabled completely now for external-toolchains anyway... -- Denys
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#138827): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138827 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74502640/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
