On 4/30/20 1:17 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 22:05, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com
<mailto:armccu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
"No way to understand it" seems a little over dramatic :-) It's
testing for the availability of a function (gbm_bo_map) within a
library (libgbm) and then making some code and one of the source files
conditional on the result of the test.
https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.67/html_node/Libraries.html
Andre, I would be more sympathetic to this, if more people would
actually work on core recipe upgrades, but alas, it seems like it's now
me alone, despite all the mail that AUH sends to supposed 'maintainers'.
I have about 60 updates queued [1], and 60 more yet to come, so when I
see a patch like this (not trivial to rebase, abandoned by original
submitter, not possible to test), I simply drop it so that progress can
be made. If you can help, please do.
your effort is appreaciated. Core however has to serve wider usecases,
so that should be considered as well, so ploughing ahead while is good
being mindful about regressing usecases is equally important. All of us
have same challanges.
[1]
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=akanavin/package-version-updates
Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#137672):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137672
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/73372190/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/leave/8023207/1426099254/xyzzy
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
