On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 14:20 +0000, chris.lapla...@agilent.com wrote:
> > "contains" has special magic where it caches the specific value
> > presence
> > rather than the whole string. I'd therefore recommend using the
> > contains
> > functions where at all possible for that reason.
>
> So then regarding my other points, it is correctly handled by the
> signature code? If so, why doesn’t it show up in task dependencies?
It should be handled correctly and it does show up.
For example,
$ bitbake-dumpsig
./tmp/stamps/core2-64-poky-linux/dbus-test/1.12.16-r0.do_configure.sig*
Variable root_prefix value is ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES',
'usrmerge', '${exec_prefix}', '${base_prefix}', d)}
DISTRO_FEATURES{usrmerge} = Unset
which means DISTRO_FEATURES didn't contain "usrmerge". It would only
change hash if DISTRO_FEATURES then did contain it, there is no
absolute value dependency.
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#137450):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137450
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/73225609/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
