On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 15:44 -0700, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote:
> From: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhl...@mvista.com>
> 
> * Add PACKAGECONFIG option for xkbcommon
> qemu-keymap.c:16:10: fatal error: xkbcommon/xkbcommon.h: No such file or 
> directory
> 
> * Add PACKAGECONFIG option and patch for libudev
> commands-posix.c:53:10: fatal error: libudev.h: No such file or directory
> 
> * Add PACKAGECONFIG option for libxml2
> util/osdep.c:136: undefined reference to `fcntl64'
> 
> - Without specifying libxml2, configure searches the system and pulls in the 
> system
>   libxml2 if it is present. In the process it adds -L/usr/lib64 which causes 
> the
>   system libc to be linked instead of the one from the extended tarball.
> 
> * Specifically remove xkbcommon and libudev from qemu-system-native 
> PACKAGECONFIG
> 
> None of the above libraries appear to be included in the depends for any of 
> the qemu
> builds, so if they are getting linked in, its probably not intentionally.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhl...@mvista.com>
> ---
>  .../qemu/qemu-system-native_4.2.0.bb               |  3 +++
>  meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc                |  4 +++
>  .../qemu/qemu/0001-Add-enable-disable-udev.patch   | 29 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu/0001-Add-enable-disable-udev.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu-system-native_4.2.0.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu-system-native_4.2.0.bb
> index d83ee59375..f3ceaa1003 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu-system-native_4.2.0.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu-system-native_4.2.0.bb
> @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ DEPENDS = "glib-2.0-native zlib-native pixman-native 
> qemu-native bison-native"
>  EXTRA_OECONF_append = " --target-list=${@get_qemu_system_target_list(d)}"
>  
>  PACKAGECONFIG ??= "fdt alsa kvm"
> +# Do not exist in buildtools-extended-tarball"
> +PACKAGECONFIG_remove = "xkbcommon"
> +PACKAGECONFIG_remove = "libudev"

I don't like this piece of the patch. Remove is generally a bad idea as
its very hard to counteract. If you did add this to PACKAGECONFIG, it
would add the appropriate -native pieces to DEPENDS so I'm not sure
what we're trying to achieve here anyway, it should work without this
remove code either way?

At the very least the comment is very misleading and will be hard to
understand in a few months time without looking back at this commit.

Cheers,

Richard

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to