On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 22:31, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > I found an old ticket where piglit was proposed for the core image > > testing, and the idea was rejected due to its huge install size, so I > > won't be pursuing this further. > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10047 > > > > Would you still say it's worth to keep the recipe in core? Python- > > numpy (that piglit and only piglit needs) isn't trivial to maintain > > either (for instance, update to latest version needs cython to be > > added to core). > > That bug is for piglit as a default in testapps. We decided that was a > bad idea, not that testing with piglit was a bad idea overall. > So adding piglit to perhaps core-image-sato-ptest would be okay? (with the resulting increase in size and do_rootfs times) Alex
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
