On 1/24/20 3:42 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
On 23/01/2020 22:43, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
Such as all the various cortex etc CPU tuning files?

LOL! :) Of course, since ARM is such an inferior arch to x86. Otherwise we should move everything that is not needed by qemux86 to meta-intel... JK :)

I almost pre-empted this comment in my reply because I knew it was coming. :)

Personally, not a terrible idea.  The slight difference is that meta-intel is *Intel's* BSP and we don't share stuff like firmware/drivers with AMD.

Ross

it will be good to find what the overlap will be, is it something that BSPs can use with minimum changes, or are we providing a template that will be copied over and housed in form of bbappends or bbs. I am not familiar enough to assess that.

Perhaps it would be good to limit this to arm compatible machines, secondly, there is a point in having it in OE-Core if meta-arm is limiting itself to arm provided BSPs alone. I think it will be good to have a platform supported in core to be able to test it, between qemu and beaglebone, I guess it is not used. Or pehaps it is and we do not use it, so that change would be good to have as well.
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to