> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Khem Raj > Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 12:45 PM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/11] findutils: Fix compilation for x32 > toolchain > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Kamble, Nitin A > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > >> Richard Purdie > >> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 1:08 AM > >> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/11] findutils: Fix compilation for > x32 > >> toolchain > >> > >> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 23:14 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:48 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > >> > > > >> > > Work around gnulib time_t assumption in findutils for x32 > >> > > >> > if its a workaround can it be applied only to x32 with help of > >> overrides please > >> > >> Its not a workaround, the patch looks like a generic reasonable fix > to > >> correct assumptions made by the program that aren't true? > > > > > > Even though x32 caught the issue, the issue is not x32 specific. And > also > > other arches are building fine with the change. So I think it is > better > > to keep this patch in oecore. > > OK then change the commit message its confusing.
Ok, I changed the commit message in the contrib. branch nitin/x32. Nitin > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
