Instead of reporting ${LICENSE} when a package is identified as using an incompatible license, report the license(s) that are actually incompatible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerst...@axis.com> --- meta/classes/base.bbclass | 26 ++++++++++++------- .../oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py | 6 ++--- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass index a3170d219c..145daea3ec 100644 --- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass @@ -542,24 +542,30 @@ python () { bb.note("Including %s as buildable despite it having an incompatible license because it has been whitelisted" % pn) else: pkgs = d.getVar('PACKAGES').split() - skipped_pkgs = [] + skipped_pkgs = {} unskipped_pkgs = [] for pkg in pkgs: - if incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses, pkg): - skipped_pkgs.append(pkg) + incompatible_lic = incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses, pkg) + if incompatible_lic: + skipped_pkgs[pkg] = incompatible_lic else: unskipped_pkgs.append(pkg) - all_skipped = skipped_pkgs and not unskipped_pkgs if unskipped_pkgs: for pkg in skipped_pkgs: - bb.debug(1, "SKIPPING the package " + pkg + " at do_rootfs because it's " + license) + bb.debug(1, "Skipping the package %s at do_rootfs because of incompatible license(s): %s" % (pkg, ' '.join(skipped_pkgs[pkg]))) mlprefix = d.getVar('MLPREFIX') - d.setVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + mlprefix + pkg, 1) + d.setVar('LICENSE_EXCLUSION-' + mlprefix + pkg, ' '.join(skipped_pkgs[pkg])) for pkg in unskipped_pkgs: - bb.debug(1, "INCLUDING the package " + pkg) - elif all_skipped or incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses): - bb.debug(1, "SKIPPING recipe %s because it's %s" % (pn, license)) - raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("it has an incompatible license: %s" % license) + bb.debug(1, "Including the package %s" % pkg) + else: + incompatible_lic = incompatible_license(d, bad_licenses) + for pkg in skipped_pkgs: + incompatible_lic += skipped_pkgs[pkg] + incompatible_lic = sorted(list(set(incompatible_lic))) + + if incompatible_lic: + bb.debug(1, "Skipping recipe %s because of incompatible license(s): %s" % (pn, ' '.join(incompatible_lic))) + raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("it has incompatible license(s): %s" % ' '.join(incompatible_lic)) # Try to verify per-package (LICENSE_<pkg>) values. LICENSE should be a # superset of all per-package licenses. We do not do advanced (pattern) diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py index ad878571b5..9d1e801117 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/incompatible_lic.py @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ from oeqa.utils.commands import bitbake class IncompatibleLicenseTests(OESelftestTestCase): def lic_test(self, pn, pn_lic, lic): - error_msg = 'ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES \'%s\'\n%s was skipped: it has an incompatible license: %s' % (pn, pn, pn_lic) + error_msg = 'ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES \'%s\'\n%s was skipped: it has incompatible license(s): %s' % (pn, pn, pn_lic) self.write_config("INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE += \"%s\"" % (lic)) @@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ class IncompatibleLicenseTests(OESelftestTestCase): # license cannot be built when INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE contains this SPDX # license def test_incompatible_spdx_license_alias(self): - self.lic_test('incompatible-license-alias', 'GPLv3', 'GPL-3.0') + self.lic_test('incompatible-license-alias', 'GPL-3.0', 'GPL-3.0') # Verify that a package with an alias (from SPDXLICENSEMAP) to an SPDX # license cannot be built when INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE contains this alias def test_incompatible_alias_spdx_license_alias(self): - self.lic_test('incompatible-license-alias', 'GPLv3', 'GPLv3') + self.lic_test('incompatible-license-alias', 'GPL-3.0', 'GPLv3') # Verify that a package with a non-SPDX license (neither in # AVAILABLE_LICENSES nor in SPDXLICENSEMAP) cannot be built when -- 2.21.0 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core