On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 3:07 PM Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 22:24 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Especially when looking at the arm64 situation I am wondering > > whether the best option might be to throw away the tunes mess and let > > the user write the compiler options directly. > > OE once did that. I think anyone who lived through it would say that > the current situation *is* an improvement over a free-for-all. > > This is mainly as at least we're now consistent whereas before the same > thing had different names in each BSP. > > I don't know what the answer is but I don't want to go back to that!
Ha ok. I won't argue with that. I can just carry the patch locally, so I'm not in a rush to get this in. I have reached out to Rich (musl maintainer) to see if he has any ideas. Alistair > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
