When systemd is built without internal resolver, it does not make
sense to expose it as a resolv-conf alternative and can even break
images where this alternative would be chosen, because of an
invalid symlink.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bard <alexandre.b...@netmodule.com>
---
 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_241.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_241.bb 
b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_241.bb
index eb3242d624..0add384a7b 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_241.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_241.bb
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ python __anonymous() {
         d.setVar("INHIBIT_UPDATERCD_BBCLASS", "1")
 }
 
-ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "halt reboot shutdown poweroff runlevel resolv-conf"
+ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "halt reboot shutdown poweroff runlevel 
${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'resolved', 'resolv-conf', '', d)}"
 
 ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[resolv-conf] = "${sysconfdir}/resolv-conf.systemd"
 ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[resolv-conf] = "${sysconfdir}/resolv.conf"
-- 
2.20.1

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to