On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 03:38:56PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 15:56 +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > Since stress-ng replaces and is compatible with stress,
> > provide stress to be compatible with the old recipe
> > and binary packages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rap...@bmw.de>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-extended/stress-ng/stress-ng_0.10.00.bb | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/stress-ng/stress-ng_0.10.00.bb
> > b/meta/recipes-extended/stress-ng/stress-ng_0.10.00.bb
> > index e800040..64e0928 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/stress-ng/stress-ng_0.10.00.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/stress-ng/stress-ng_0.10.00.bb
> > @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> > "d09dd2a1aea549e478995bf9be90b38906a4cdf33ea7b245ef9d46aa52
> >
> > DEPENDS = "coreutils-native"
> >
> > +PROVIDES = "stress"
> > +RPROVIDES_${PN} = "stress"
> > +RPROVIDES_${PN}-dev = "stress-dev"
> > +
>
> Isn't that going to need RCONFLICTS and RREPLACES too?
I did not need them. I'm not updating existing images or mixing
stress and stress-ng binary packages in a package repo.
But I will add them in a v2.
-Mikko
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
