On 7/19/19 2:41 PM, Petr Vorel wrote:
Hi Hongzhi,
...
--- /dev/null
+++
b/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-getrlimit03-adjust-a-bit-of-code-to-compatiable-with.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+From e79652a3839869b1983d65999e5d5dcb50bc9cd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: "Hongzhi.Song" <hongzhi.s...@windriver.com>
+Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 03:39:06 -0400
+Subject: [PATCH] getrlimit03: adjust a bit of code to compatiable with mips32
...
+Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstan...@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song <hongzhi.s...@windriver.com>
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song <hongzhi.s...@windriver.com>
+---
+ testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c | 8 +++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I have to say I prefer policy when only build fixes are backported / added.
(approach which e.g. buildroot has). Having many patches (25 atm) makes updating
a bit difficult (ok, not that much, 'Upstream-Status: Backport' shows what has
been merged since last release) and sometimes brings users patches which weren't
accepted by upstream (your mips patch [1] was not accepted [2]
Thanks for your kindly remind.
Agree with you. It's time to uprev ltp recipe.
From now, if the "Submitting or Backport" is appropriate,
I will make sure the patch was merged by ltp before it was sent to oe-core.
Great! Feel free to Cc me when sending patches.
).
But I understand that LTP 3 months release cycle can be to
slow for some LTP users.
Kind regards,
Petr
PS: I'm slowly working on fixing all musl issues in LTP upstream. It's a long
term run but were moving towards that goal.
Patch "build: Add option to select libc implementation" [3] is a not a good
approach. Instead it's needed to find for each failure why it's not presented
in musl. Mostly because it uses non POSIX features or deprecated API, which
needs to be avoided or used kernel headers where it's available.
[1]
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0001-open_posix_testsuite-mmap24-2-Relax-condition-a-bit.patch
I am working on this patch.
Good.
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/982194/#2012168
This patch has been merge by ltp finally.
To LTP upstream? I don't see it [4]. That's the patch you working on.
Hi Petr,
quote your statement above : "[2]
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/982194/#2012168";
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/7a3bca63cd7f059d490b6274f0fdf3247be93fde
--Hongzhi
--Hongzhi
[3]
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-extended/ltp/ltp/0004-build-Add-option-to-select-libc-implementation.patch
[4]
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commits/master/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
