<richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> 于2019年7月18日周四 下午8:33写道：
>
> On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 17:18 +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> 于2019年7月17日周三 下午7:41写道：
> > > On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 15:10 +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> > > > u-boot.bin with dtb & signature should be placed in ${B} so that
> > > > it can be deployed by u-boot as expected. Otherwise, the version
> > > > without signature is installed.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun....@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > meta/classes/uboot-sign.bbclass | 4 +++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > I continue to be very worried we have no test coverage in this area
> > > of
> > > the code. Since I don't know it particularly well I'm effectively
> > > merging patches blindly :(.
> >
> > Then I think you can merge it as long as it pass current test
> > coverage. Because I already test the FIT signature feature comes back
> > with this patch :-)
>
> It has merged but my point is we really need better test coverage of
> these areas of the code.
>
> What I'd really like is for people to help write tests which showed the
> broken behaviour the patch is fixing.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
Just find that there are runqemu script and some qemu test in
openembedded-core/script. But it seems that u-boot is not enabled in
qemu test yet and current test case is only for kernel feature. So
there is huge gap in u-boot test side. I can have a try later, but
cannot make any promise.
Best Regards.
Jun
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
