On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 23:00 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 21:32 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard Purdie > >> > What specific problem are you trying to solve? > >> > >> The specific issue I'm having is for our 64-bit part that still uses a > >> 32-bit u-boot. Not sure the best approach really is... > > > > Hmm, does it really need libgcc? > > I pretty sure... I don't think it uses much though. > > > > >> I've tried utilizing multilib by adding the following to my u-boot > >> recipe, but it's just hacky... > >> > >> DEPENDS_e5500-64b_append = " lib32-gcc" > >> CC_e5500-64b = "powerpc-poky-linux-gcc -m32" > >> > >> I'd rather NOT recompile gcc/eglibc/etc just for this 32-bit build of > >> u-boot where we don't need libc. I'd rather just have a functional > >> 32bit/64bit compiler for our 64-bit target. > > > > The trouble is that you need glibc-intermediate to build gcc-cross > > (which builds a functional libgcc). You therefore can't short circuit > > this as much as you think :/. > > Is there a way to skip eglibc then? That would make things much better.
If you depend just on lib32-libgcc:do_populate_sysroot, it shouldn't build eglibc. You can do that with something like: do_compile[depends] += "lib32-libgcc:do_populate_sysroot" Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core