Hi Adrian, On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 4:18 PM Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 03:56:33PM +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:27 PM Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > From: André Draszik <[email protected]> > > > > > > It looks like there is an implicit dependency on util-linux' > > > umount - as otherwise when using busybox' umount we see a > > > long delay on shutdown / reboot. > > > > > > [YOCTO #13058] > > > > If systemd needs util-linux mount/umount in master it should also > depend on them in older releases (both master and thud had systemd 239 > at that point). > Agreed. I was just adding info to this e-mail thread. The "looks like there is an implicit dependency" text was a bit too vague for me. I'ld like to add the root cause that was found.
The implicit dependency was for a specific option to umount to be supported. If we have the proper busybox in master, we no longer have a implicit dependency on util-linux-umount. (The reason for the util-linux-mount dependency was different, AFAIK.) Regards, Leon. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
