On 2019/1/21 上午10:17, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 6:12 PM Kang Kai <kai.k...@windriver.com> wrote:
On 2019/1/19 上午4:54, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:43 PM Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 17:55, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am bit concerned about using -ffile-prefix-map here, its gcc only
option so will cause clang to fail
It's almost like we need a toolchain override so this can be gcc-specific...

I've been meaning to do that for about a year now :(

Until then, couldn't meta-clang just override the value from the layer?
yes it can, but one by one there are many changes to keep and core becomes
tied to gcc. We should be conscious about it.

  From the link https://reviews.llvm.org/D49466 pasted by Dan, we know
that clang will support option '-ffile-prefix-map'.
I prefer to override DEBUG_PREFIX_MAP in meta-clang and remove it when
clang support for '-ffile-prefix-map' implemented.
Thats ok, not worried about clang at this point. But the patch itself
was not working last time on gcc either. So if that is fixed we can consider it.


OK. I am working on the issued pointed by Richard.



Regards,
Kai


Ross

--
Kai Kang


--
Kai Kang

--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to