Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 21:48 +0000 schrieb Richard Purdie: > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 21:55 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 14 nov. 2011, om 21:39 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 20:17 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > >> I think splitting distccmon-gnome into a seperate recipe is a better > > >> idea. > > > > > > I think that makes sense in some cases but I'd hate for it to become the > > > default approach for issues like this as the duplication of code, > > > parsing and build time etc. grate on me. Do we really need separate > > > recipes? > > > > I think for this case, yes. And I'll happily trade needing extra > > buildtime for not needing USEFLAGS. > > > The proposals for alternative recipes for the different combinations got > voted down and PACKAGECONFIG was the preferred solution.
Where is this vote (and discussion) documented? I found nothing in the OE Wiki and searching for it with »openembedded packageconfig vote oe-core list« brought up only some minutes [1]. I also do not remember anything on openembedded-devel where such general discussion definitely belong in my opinion. It would be great if somebody could help me by giving me an URL. > I can't say I personally like everything about the outcome. I do > however understand why we've ended up in that position and don't > intend to undermine the usefulness of it. […] Thanks, Paul [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded.core/7688
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
